Harry and Meghan suffer TWO security breaches at their $14 million California mansion: Both Sussexs and their two young children were at home when the alarm went off in May
- Meghan and Harry faced two separate incidents last May that triggered security alarms at their home in Montecito, California.
- Both the Duke and Duchess of Sussex were at home at the time with their children, three-year-old Archie and one-year-old Lilibet.
- California police were dispatched to the $13.8 million mansion at 5:44 PM on May 19, which also happens to be the couple’s wedding anniversary.
- The break-ins in May were registered by police as trespassing, property crime and ‘suspicious circumstances’
- Just 12 days later, on May 31, when Harry and Meghan flew back from Queen Elizabeth’s platinum jubilee, they responded to another warning
Prince Harry and Meghan Marklea recently dealt with two separate intruder alarms triggered on their California at home with an interval of less than two weeks.
Meghan and Harry were believed to have been at their home in the town of Montecito with their children, two-year-old Archie and one-year-old Lilibet, when the incident took place.
Police in Santa Barbara, who deal with the law in Montecito, were reportedly sent to the $13.8 million mansion at 5:44 p.m. May 19, specifically to mark the couple’s fourth wedding anniversary.
Just 12 days later, on May 31, just hours before Harry and Meghan were due to board a private jet from California to the United Kingdom for Queen Elizabeth’s Platinum Anniversarythey responded to another intruder warning.
The break-ins in May were registered by the police as trespassing, property crime and ‘suspicious circumstances’.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle set off two separate burglar alarms at their California home earlier this year
Police in Santa Barbara, dealing with the law in Montecito, were dispatched to the $13.8 million mansion at 5:44 p.m. May 19, specifically to mark the couple’s fourth wedding anniversary.
Just 12 days later, on May 31, when Harry and Meghan flew back to California from Queen Elizabeth’s Platinum Jubilee, they responded to another intruder warning.
Santa Barbara authorities have had to deal with half a dozen security calls to their homes in the past 14 months The sun.
It comes the same day that the Duke of Sussex won a bid to file a Supreme Court claim against the UK government about his security arrangements while he was in his home country.
Harry is taking legal action over a decision not to allow him to pay for police protection for himself and his family when he comes to visit from North America.
In the first phase of the case earlier this month, the Duke’s lawyers asked Mr Justice Swift to authorize a full hearing to allow a judge to review the Home Office decision.
In a ruling on Friday, the Supreme Court judge said the case could go ahead, and allowed part of Harry’s claim to have a judicial review.
The break-ins in May were registered by police as trespassing, property crime and ‘suspicious circumstances’
Harry and Meghan flew back to California from Queen Elizabeth’s platinum jubilee when the second burglary happened
But in a blow to the duke’s case, the judge refused to allow some of his claims to get a review.
He rejected the arguments of Harry’s legal team that he should have been told who on the committee made the protection decision and that he had not had the opportunity to comment on the ‘appropriateness’ of the trial and the individuals involved in the blockage. .
The request for permission to apply for judicial review is partially granted and partially denied.’ said Swift.
The Duke of Sussex won a bid to file part of his High Court claim against the Home Office over his security arrangements while in the UK. Prince Harry is taking legal action over a decision not to allow him to pay for police protection for himself and his family when visiting from North America. Above: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle photographed together in Brixton, South London, in 2018
The Duke’s challenge relates to the February 2020 decision of the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalties and Public Figures (Ravec) over his safety, after being told he would no longer receive the same level of personal protection when visiting. .
Harry’s legal team is trying to argue that the security arrangements set out in a letter from Ravec, and their application when he visited the UK in June 2021, were invalid due to “procedural unfairness” as he was not given the opportunity to “advance informed representations”. ‘.